In the corporate landscape, there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that shake the foundations of integrity . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, is a perfect example of the latter — a tale of presumed malfeasance that deeply harms the reputation of a single manager but brings scrutiny over the enterprise’s integrity.

Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has kept his position , seemingly unaffected by the uproar enveloping him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of improper behavior was initiated by breaking of the business principles, but it didn’t end there . Instead, it intensified into a pattern of misconduct that has left colleagues jaded and stakeholders confused .

During a leadership training program — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a professional opportunity into a chain of irresponsible incidents . It’s reported he spent organization-paid excursions engaging in flirtatious behavior , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his family remained uninformed .

But the indiscretions didn’t end with romantic pursuits . One of the gravest disclosures involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to share suggestive pictures to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to send suggestive messages —including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — exposes a personality of a man heedless of the repercussions . Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on several instances during work time , despite his being married and her having a spouse . This blatant misuse of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but destroyed families —creating a trail of betrayal that extended outside of the organizational context.

Why can this behavior be tolerated to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still in a position of power at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, originates in a concerning absence of supervision within the organization . Issues have been raised , yet Collins persists unabated.

This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that authority and prestige within the firm can guard against punishment . It breeds a damaging work setting, discourages team members, and ultimately undermines check the business’s ethics.